Costa Rica has no treaties with other countries for child abduction when a parent has legal custody.
Last week another U.S. father was in Costa Rica seeking a son for whom he had legal custody of. Unfortunately, the father so far has struck out, forcing him to hired a private investigator.
This is just another case of a U.S. parent running out on a divorce decision and abducting their child. The case originated over a year ago in Boise, Idaho and the mother is believed to have fled to Costa Rica with the child. It is believed that hundreds (some say 1000s) of abducted children reside in Costa Rica.
The problem any parent faces is Costa Rica’s does not abide by interstate enforcement of custody and visitation orders. In other words, the right off the bat any parent had three strikes against them, first strike is the U.S. Embassy in San Jose, but like many countries, embassy personnel take a back seat and fail to act on information about abducted children when a parent tries to seek their help.
The second strike, Óscar Arias Sánchez administration has ignored and will not enforce any international child abduction treaties obligations and the third strike, Costa Rica is well known to, and accepts refugee applications from those mothers/fathers fleeing U.S. justice. So all a parent has to do is claim some sort of legal problem with the US and they can enter.
Another problem is that Costa Rican officials are quick to believe lies/tales of spousal abuse and seldom try to get full information by contacting investigators or judges in the United States.
While interstate enforcement of custody and visitation orders, may prove difficult, international enforcement compounds those difficulties. Absent in Costa Rica is a Child Abduction Treaty, where an order issued by, lets say, a United States court, may be enforced and one that does not run into road blocks based on the foreign country’s own law or on principles of comity (legal reciprocity). The treaty used by the United States and a growing number of other countries is the Hague International Child Abduction Convention.
The purpose of the Hague Convention is to secure prompt return of children wrongfully removed from or retained in any nation party to the treaty (contracting state), and to ensure that custody and visitation (access) rights are effectively respected in other contracting states. The Hague convention may not be used to establish or to relitigate custody. The convention applies to children under the age of sixteen and provides both substantive and procedural rules pertaining to enforcement of custody rights.
The Hague Convention may only be used and enforced where there is an existing court order for custody like the one parent has. However, its procedures may be used to regain custody where a child was taken prior to the time a court issued the custody order.
The Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction [known as the Hague Convention] is the main international treaty that can assist parents whose children have been abducted to another country. As of August 2007, approximately 80 countries have adopted the Convention and Costa Rica is not one of them. It offers considerable assistance in the case of children abducted to signatory countries, and just in Canada alone, over 400 Canadian children have been returned under its arrangements.
Probabil ca unii dintre voi se intreaba care este rostul prezentei unui om de afaceri tanar in politica si de ce am initiat aceasta implicare politica pe zona de stanga, centru stanga? Ei bine, socotesc ca neimplicarea politica, dezinteresul si expresia dezgustului fata de anumite gesturi politice la care am fost martori pana astazi, nu reprezinta sub niciun aspect o scuza. Cred cu tarie ca sta in puterea noastra sa ne construim viitorul dupa regulile si in matricea de principii corespunzatoare generatiei noastre si a vremurilor pe care le traim. Daca nu facem noi saltul spre progres, cu siguranta nu se va gasi nimeni care sa o faca in locul nostru. In ce priveste orientarea de stanga, ea tradeaza ca sunt un tanar normal si obisnuit. In toate mediile civilizate europene si in consistenta intelectuala a tinerilor sta ascunsa dorinta de echitate sociala si de egalitate de sanse, in consecinta, orientarea mea de stanga confirma nazuintele mele firesti.
Marius Margarit UNPR Galati
Thanks for the information
It is really very helpful.
Thank you for giving information
Good article. Keep it up.
Always interesting to follow annice website. Thank you for the post. In addition, apart from the content , the design of your blog looks really beautiful . Cheers.
This is a very good blog,I hope that I can read more content.
Costa Rica is part of the Hague it became in effect 01-01-2008 Go to http://www.travel.state.gov
Many statistics given concerning the children returned to the U.S.under the Hague Convention are misleading or down right incorrect. Many children return due to some other reason. The abductor ran out of money, resources, a place to live etc. and returns on their own. Some are threatened, and they become scared and return on their own. Some left because of a promise by someone else to help them out and give them a place, but that didn’t turn out well, so they came back. Many are discovered traveling to other countries and are arrested because of a warrant (ususally only father’s though, rarely mothers).. In some cases, they are lured back with promises of large financial divorce settlements with equal custody(as in the Saivoy case.(but then they just take off again anyway as she did).
In the U.S. there are at least 2800 open Hague cases. The State Dept. does NOTHING to help these parents.If a parent comes back, they mark it down as “RESOLVED” even though they did NOTHING.
If a child becomes 16,the case is ENDED, they are no longer kept on the list and they mark it down as “RESOLVED”….so they have LOTS of RESOLVED cases.
They are not only NOT helpful to the parents left behind, they interfere, when the parent tries to handle things themselves.
There reallly is NO more benefit if your child is taken to a “Hague Country”, than if they were taken to say, oh !!Costa Rica!!